Skip to main content

TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB

TeamGroupElite DDR4-3200 2x16GB32 GB · 3200 MT/s · 22 CL · 13.75 nsLeads on Speed
TimetecPremium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB32 GB · 2666 MT/s · 19 CL · 14.25 ns
In short

On true latency TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB comes out ahead: 13.75 ns, where Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB takes 14.25 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.

SpecificationTeamGroupElite DDR4-3200 2x16GBTimetecPremium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)3200better2666
2219
True latency (ns)13.75better14.25
Current best price
Price per GB

Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.

TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB in detail

True latency

TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 13.75 ns, against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB — a difference of 0.50 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 2666 MT/s at CL19.

Transfer rate

TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB is rated 3200 MT/s against 2666 MT/s for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB — 25600 MB/s per module, against 21328 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Kit layout

TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Lighting and ECC

On the lighting question: TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On error correction: TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB is published with no ECC, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.

Which to buy

At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency at 13.75 ns.

Common questions about this pair

Is TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB?
TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB is, on true latency: 13.75 ns against 14.25 ns. TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22 and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 2666 MT/s at CL19; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
Which of these two should I buy?
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency at 13.75 ns.
How we track prices

Related comparisons