TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB comes out ahead: 9.44 ns, where TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB takes 9.50 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 7200 | 8000better |
| 34 | 38 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.44better | 9.50 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 9.44 ns, against 9.50 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.06 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is rated 8000 MT/s against 7200 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB — 64000 MB/s per module, against 57600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting
On the lighting question: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 9.44 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is, on true latency: 9.44 ns against 9.50 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 9.44 ns.