ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB vs Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17
9.44 ns of true latency for Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 against 10.00 ns for ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB | KingstonFURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 16 | 16 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3600better |
| 16 | 17 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 9.44better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB vs Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 is the lower-latency kit at 9.44 ns, against 10.00 ns for ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB — a difference of 0.56 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 runs 3600 MT/s at CL17.
Transfer rate
Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 is rated 3600 MT/s against 3200 MT/s for ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB — 28800 MB/s per module, against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB ships as 2 × 8GB and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 ships as 2 × 8GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB does not have RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB runs 16-18-18, and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 does not publish one. On error correction: ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB is published with no ECC, and the catalog does not state whether Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 supports it. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 has the lower true latency, 9.44 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB faster than Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17?
- Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 is, on true latency: 9.44 ns against 10.00 ns. ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16 and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 runs 3600 MT/s at CL17; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 2x8GB 3600 CL17 has the lower true latency, 9.44 ns.