ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 30 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB gets there at 6000 MT/s at CL30, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at 6400 MT/s at CL32. CAS latency counts clock cycles rather than time, so a higher clock paired with a looser CAS number arrives at the same place — which is why these two spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB publishes none, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102.
Which to buy
No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 10.00 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and those two land in the same place.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 10.00 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.