ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | G.SKILLTrident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 30 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB gets there at 6400 MT/s at CL32, G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 6000 MT/s at CL30. CAS latency counts clock cycles rather than time, so a higher clock paired with a looser CAS number arrives at the same place — which is why these two spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39, and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is 30-38-38-96. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has it, and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give — and the specifications do not break the tie either: both arrive at 10.00 ns of true latency. What is left to choose on is above.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, and those two land in the same place.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give — and the specifications do not break the tie either: both arrive at 10.00 ns of true latency. What is left to choose on is above.