ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32

ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB32 GB · 6400 MT/s · 32 CL · 10.00 ns
TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL3232 GB · 6400 MT/s · 32 CL · 10.00 ns
In short

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.

SpecificationADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GBTeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)64006400
3232
True latency (ns)10.0010.00
Current best price
Price per GB

Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail

True latency

Both kits land on 10.00 ns. Neither spec sheet differs from the other on the two figures that decide it — 6400 MT/s at CL32 on each side — so the reconciled result is identical rather than merely close.

Transfer rate

Both kits are rated 6400 MT/s, which is 51200 MB/s per module, and both are published at CL32. Those are the two figures the true latency above is computed from, so it comes out the same for each.

Kit layout

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.

Voltage

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.

Lighting and timings

On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102.

Which to buy

No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 10.00 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.

Common questions about this pair

Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and those two land in the same place.
Which of these two should I buy?
No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 10.00 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.
How we track prices

Related comparisons