ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 38 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 12.67 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, 2.67 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB publishes none.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.