Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB vs Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 has the lower true latency of the two at 16.43 ns, against 16.67 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB | Silicon PowerValue Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4800 | 5600better |
| 40 | 46 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.67 | 16.43better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB vs Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 in detail
True latency
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 is the lower-latency kit at 16.43 ns against 16.67 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB, 0.24 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB runs 4800 MT/s at CL40; Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 runs 5600 MT/s at CL46.
Transfer rate
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 carries the higher rating, 5600 MT/s to 4800 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB — 44800 MB/s per module against 38400 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB is specified at 1.1 V and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB is published with no RGB lighting, and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB publishes none, and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 is 30-38-38-96.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 has the lower true latency at 16.43 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB faster than Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46?
- Yes, on true latency: 16.43 ns for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 against 16.67 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB runs 4800 MT/s at CL40 and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 runs 5600 MT/s at CL46, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x32GB 5600 CL46 has the lower true latency at 16.43 ns.