Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
10.00 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 against 11.61 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6200 | 6400better |
| 36 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 11.61 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 11.61 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB, 1.61 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB runs 6200 MT/s at CL36; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6200 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 49600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB publishes none, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 against 11.61 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6200 2x16GB runs 6200 MT/s at CL36 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.