Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 vs V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB
10.00 ns of true latency for V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 10.56 ns for Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 | V-ColorSkywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600better | 3200 |
| 19 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.56 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 vs V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 10.56 ns for Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19, 0.56 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 runs 3600 MT/s at CL19; V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16.
Transfer rate
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 carries the higher rating, 3600 MT/s to 3200 MT/s for V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB — 28800 MB/s per module against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 ships as 2 × 16GB and V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 is published with no RGB lighting, and V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 is 16-20-20-38, and V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB is 16-18-18-38. On error correction: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 faster than V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 10.56 ns for Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19. Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL19 runs 3600 MT/s at CL19 and V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that V-Color Skywalker Plus DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.