Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB vs TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB
TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 16.00 ns, against 16.25 ns for Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | CrucialDDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB | TeamGroupElite DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 52 | 48 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.25 | 16.00better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB vs TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 16.00 ns against 16.25 ns for Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB, 0.25 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52; TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL48.
Transfer rate
Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB is 52-52-52-103, and TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB publishes none.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB has the lower true latency at 16.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB faster than TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 16.00 ns for TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB against 16.25 ns for Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB. Crucial DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52 and TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL48, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup Elite DDR5-6000 2x16GB has the lower true latency at 16.00 ns.