G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 vs Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB
7.50 ns of true latency for G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | G.SkillTrident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 | TimetecPremium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 16 | 16 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4000better | 3200 |
| 15 | 22 | |
| True latency (ns) | 7.50better | 13.75 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 vs Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB in detail
True latency
G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 is the lower-latency kit at 7.50 ns against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB, 6.25 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 runs 4000 MT/s at CL15; Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22.
Transfer rate
G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 carries the higher rating, 4000 MT/s to 3200 MT/s for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB — 32000 MB/s per module against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 ships as 2 × 8GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB ships as 2 × 8GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and ECC
On lighting: G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 has RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB is published with no RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 has it, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 is the quicker at 7.50 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 7.50 ns for G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB. G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 runs 4000 MT/s at CL15 and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x8GB 4000 CL15 is the quicker at 7.50 ns of true latency.