G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | G.SKILLTrident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 30 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB gets there at 6000 MT/s at CL30, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at 6400 MT/s at CL32. CAS latency counts clock cycles rather than time, so a higher clock paired with a looser CAS number arrives at the same place — which is why these two spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is 30-38-38-96, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102. On error correction: G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 10.00 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and those two land in the same place.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 10.00 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.