Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB vs Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB has the lower true latency of the two at 14.29 ns, against 16.43 ns for Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB | KingstonServer Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600 | 5600 |
| 40 | 46 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.29better | 16.43 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB vs Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 14.29 ns, against 16.43 ns for Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB — a difference of 2.14 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40; Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 5600 MT/s, which is 44800 MB/s per module. Their spec sheets part company on CAS latency rather than on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what separates them.
Kit layout
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB ships as 2 × 16GB, Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB ships as 1 × 32GB. That is a real difference and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for a later addition. Which suits depends on the board and on whether more memory is planned.
Voltage
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is specified at 1.25 V and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB at 1.1 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB does not have RGB lighting, and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB runs 40-40-40, and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB does not publish one. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB supports it, and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB is published with ECC support. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is the quicker at 14.29 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB faster than Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB?
- Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is, on true latency: 14.29 ns against 16.43 ns. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40 and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is the quicker at 14.29 ns of true latency.