Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 14.29 ns, against 16.43 ns for Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB | KingstonServer Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600 | 5600 |
| 40 | 46 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.29better | 16.43 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 14.29 ns against 16.43 ns for Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB, 2.14 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40; Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 5600 MT/s, or 44800 MB/s per module. They part company on CAS latency instead of on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what tells them apart.
Kit layout
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB, Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB ships as 1 × 32GB. A real difference, and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for adding later. Which suits comes down to the board and to whether more memory is planned.
Voltage
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is specified at 1.25 V and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB at 1.1 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is 40-40-40, and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB publishes none. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB has it, and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB supports ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is the quicker at 14.29 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB faster than Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 14.29 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB against 16.43 ns for Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40 and Kingston Server Premier DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is the quicker at 14.29 ns of true latency.