Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB
14.29 ns of true latency for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB against 16.25 ns for Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB | KingstonValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600 | 6400better |
| 40 | 52 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.29better | 16.25 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 14.29 ns, against 16.25 ns for Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB — a difference of 1.96 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40; Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52.
Transfer rate
Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 5600 MT/s for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 44800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB, Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB ships as 1 × 32GB. That is a real difference and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for a later addition. Which suits depends on the board and on whether more memory is planned.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 40-40-40, and Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is the quicker at 14.29 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB faster than Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB?
- Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is, on true latency: 14.29 ns against 16.25 ns. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40 and Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is the quicker at 14.29 ns of true latency.