Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32

KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB32 GB · 6000 MT/s · 36 CL · 12.00 ns
TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL3232 GB · 6400 MT/s · 32 CL · 10.00 nsLeads on Speed
In short

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 12.00 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.

SpecificationKingstonFURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GBTeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)60006400better
3632
True latency (ns)12.0010.00better
Current best price
Price per GB

Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail

True latency

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB, 2.00 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL36; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32.

Transfer rate

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.

Kit layout

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.

Lighting and timings

On lighting: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB publishes none, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102.

Which to buy

At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency at 10.00 ns.

Common questions about this pair

Is Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 against 12.00 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL36 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
Which of these two should I buy?
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency at 10.00 ns.
How we track prices

Related comparisons