Skip to main content

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB

KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB32 GB · 6400 MT/s · 32 CL · 10.00 nsLeads on Speed
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GBKLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB32 GB · 6000 MT/s · 30 CL · 10.00 nsLeads on Current best price
In short

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. The latency is level, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is the one tracked at the lower price, so cost is the only difference.

SpecificationKingstonFURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GBKLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)6400better6000
3230
True latency (ns)10.0010.00
Current best priceR$ 4.480,00at Amazon.com.br · captured 2026-09-25R$ 4.364,00betterat Amazon.com.br · captured 2026-09-25
Price per GBR$ 140,00R$ 136,38better

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail

True latency

Both kits land on 10.00 ns by different routes: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB at 6400 MT/s at CL32, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 6000 MT/s at CL30. A CAS number counts cycles rather than time, so a higher clock absorbs a looser one and the two arrive together — which is why these spec sheets look different and the memory does not.

Transfer rate

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Price and tracked history

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at R$ 4.480,00 — R$ 140,00 per gigabyte — and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB at R$ 4.364,00, or R$ 136,38. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is R$ 116,00 less than Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB. R$ 4.480,00 is the lowest price this site has recorded for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB. At R$ 4.364,00, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is running 0% below its own 90-day median.

Kit layout

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Voltage

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.

Lighting, timings and ECC

On the lighting question: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 32-39-39, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 30-36-36-76. On error correction: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published with no ECC, and the catalog does not state whether KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB supports it. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.

Which to buy

KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB costs less than Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB at the prices tracked here, and the two are identical on true latency at 10.00 ns. It is the cheaper kit, not the faster one — nothing here suggests it will feel quicker.

Common questions about this pair

Is Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
Neither. Both come out at 10.00 ns of true latency: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, and the two reconcile to one figure.
Which one costs less?
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB, at R$ 4.364,00 against R$ 4.480,00 — R$ 116,00 apart at the same 32GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB costs less than Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB at the prices tracked here, and the two are identical on true latency at 10.00 ns. It is the cheaper kit, not the faster one — nothing here suggests it will feel quicker.
How we track prices

Related comparisons