Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 12.67 ns for Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | LexarTHOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 38 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 12.67 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 12.67 ns for Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — a difference of 2.67 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 38-48-48-96, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 32-39-39-102.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency at 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns. Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency at 10.00 ns.