TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB
7.78 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB against 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3600better |
| 16 | 14 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 7.78better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 7.78 ns, against 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB — a difference of 2.22 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is rated 3600 MT/s against 3200 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB — 28800 MB/s per module, against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB at 1.45 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting
On the lighting question: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 7.78 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB?
- TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is, on true latency: 7.78 ns against 10.00 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16 and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 7.78 ns.