TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 comes out ahead: 10.00 ns, where TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB takes 12.67 ns. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 38 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 12.67 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, 2.67 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB publishes none.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.