TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 30 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 gets there at 6400 MT/s at CL32, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 at 6000 MT/s at CL30. CAS latency counts clock cycles rather than time, so a higher clock paired with a looser CAS number arrives at the same place — which is why these two spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 publishes none.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 10.00 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB 6000 CL30 runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, and those two land in the same place.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 10.00 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.