G.SKILL

G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 Spec and Price in Brazil

DDR52x16GBUDIMM10.00 ns true latency

Ripjaws S5 is G.SKILL's non-RGB take on a mainstream-to-enthusiast DDR5-6000 kit, running the exact same 6000 MT/s, CL30, 30-40-40-96 timings and 1.35V profile as G.SKILL's Trident Z5 RGB. Since the underlying numbers are identical between the two, the only real variable is whether a build wants illuminated modules or a plainer finish. Remove RGB from the comparison entirely and what's left is 6000 MT/s at CL30, 30-40-40-96, 1.35V — identical on both kits.

Tied 40th of 139 models in the RAM catalog on Speed — 33 models share this figure.

Current best price

No tracked price — this page compares specifications alone.

Specifications

Capacity: 2x16GB
True latency: 10.00 ns
Memory type: DDR5
Speed: 6000 MT/s
CAS latency
Form factor: UDIMM
Voltage: 1.35 V
Timings: 30-40-40-96
Modules: 2
RGB: No

Capacities

Configuration	Part number	Speed	CAS latency	True latency
2x16GB	F5-6000J3040F16GX2-RS5K	6000 MT/s	30	10.00 ns
2x32GB	F5-6000J3040G32GX2-RS5K	6000 MT/s	30	10.00 ns

Guides for this category

How much RAM you actually needHow to size memory from the pressure your machine is under now, why running short quietly costs speed, and when a matched pair beats one stick.RAM speed and latency, and when they matterWhat a kit's MT/s and CAS latency each measure, why true latency is the two together, and the machines where the numbers actually change anything.SO-DIMM vs DIMM: the memory a laptop takesWhy laptop memory is a different module from desktop memory, how DDR4 and DDR5 are keyed apart, and why some machines take no module at all.What is ECC memory, and when you need itWhat error-correcting memory actually catches, how registered and load-reduced modules differ from unbuffered ones, and why the platform decides.

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

Well suited to Intel platforms, with compact, attractive low-profile modules at a reasonable price.

Commonly criticised

Optimized for Intel only, so AMD owners get less benefit, and overclocking headroom is below average.

Sources behind this summary

Tom's Hardware — review

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.