Skip to main content
PickyPeacock
Sign in
TeamGroup

TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 Spec and Price in Canada

DDR52x16GBUDIMM10.00 ns true latency

Content creators and workstation builders are the intended audience for the T-Create Expert, which skips the T-Force Delta's RGB lighting and puts its DDR5-6000 speed and 30-36-36-76 timings at 1.35V toward consistency instead. The 32GB (2x16) configuration suits multitasking-heavy productivity work over pure gaming benchmarks. It's positioned for buyers who want dependable DDR5 for creative or professional loads rather than a lit-up gaming build.

Tied 40th of 139 models in the RAM catalog on Speed — 33 models share this figure.

Current best price
From $739.99at Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-25 · $23.12/GBView at Amazon.ca

Prices exclude GST/HST.

The 2x16GB TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 currently sells for $739.99 at Amazon.ca in Canada, captured 2026-09-25. Across 2 tracked merchants and 567 days of observation, the 90-day median for the 2x16GB TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 is $764.69 and the lowest tracked price is $115.99.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

30D90D180DAll
  • 2x16GB
  • 2x32GB
  • 2x32GB CL34
April 30, 2026202 capturestoday · $1,560.41

Each point is one capture, not a list price. How we track prices

Among 32GB kits, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 is cheaper ($637.99) at the same latency (10.00 ns).
Compare side by side

Specifications

Capacity
2x16GB
True latency
10.00 ns
Memory type
DDR5
Speed
6000 MT/s
CAS latency
Form factor
UDIMM
Voltage
1.35 V
Timings
30-36-36-76
Modules
2
RGB
No

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberSpeedCAS latencyTrue latencyCurrent best pricePrice per GB
2x16GBCTCED532G6000HC30DC016000 MT/s3010.00 ns
$739.99

at Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-25

$23.12/GB
2x32GBCTCED564G6000HC30CDC016000 MT/s3010.00 ns——
2x32GB CL34CTCED564G6000HC34BDC016000 MT/s3411.33 ns
$1,560.41

at Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-25

$24.38/GB

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 2 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • Ample capacity for professional workloads, in a low-profile design that avoids cooler clearance problems.
  • Supports both Intel XMP 3.0 and AMD EXPO profiles.
  • Owners report the kit reaches its rated EXPO or XMP speed out of the box on both AMD AM5 and Intel platforms, with no manual tuning.
  • It is repeatedly described as good value for low-latency DDR5, often as a no-frills kit without RGB.
  • The low-profile heatspreader fits under large air coolers, and several owners note it runs cool.
  • Owners like the clean look, and some note the line offers more than one profile for different platforms.

Commonly criticised

  • Loose primary timings and poor overclocking headroom.
  • Owners pursuing the higher-speed profiles in the line note they need a capable motherboard and CPU, and that board support for the top speeds can be limited.
  • DDR5 pricing overall is called high, though owners say this kit is fairly priced against rivals.
  • A few owners had to enable the profile in the BIOS before the rated speed applied.

Sources behind this summary

Guides for this category

How much RAM you actually needHow to size memory from the pressure your machine is under now, why running short quietly costs speed, and when a matched pair beats one stick.RAM speed and latency, and when they matterWhat a kit's MT/s and CAS latency each measure, why true latency is the two together, and the machines where the numbers actually change anything.SO-DIMM vs DIMM: the memory a laptop takesWhy laptop memory is a different module from desktop memory, how DDR4 and DDR5 are keyed apart, and why some machines take no module at all.What is ECC memory, and when you need itWhat error-correcting memory actually catches, how registered and load-reduced modules differ from unbuffered ones, and why the platform decides.

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.