Timetec Premium M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 SSD Spec and Price in Canada
Timetec's NVMe line swaps the SATA interface for PCIe 3.0 x4, more than tripling sequential throughput to 2,000/1,600 MB/s across 256GB to 1TB (3,400/3,000 MB/s on the 2TB), with endurance ratings from 150TBW to 2,000TBW and a five-year warranty — two years longer than its SATA-based stablemate despite both being DRAM-less TLC designs. It's positioned as a budget NVMe upgrade for users who want a meaningful speed jump over SATA without paying flagship prices. As with the rest of Timetec's lineup, expect baseline specs on paper rather than extensive third-party benchmarking or brand recognition.
Tied 81st of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential read — 3 models share this figure. 82nd of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential write.
Prices exclude GST/HST.
The 512GB Timetec Premium M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 SSD currently sells for $114.99 at Amazon.ca in Canada, captured 2026-09-24. Across one tracked merchant and 58 days of observation, the 90-day median for the 512GB Timetec Premium M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 SSD is $114.49 and the lowest tracked price is $34.99.
Captured periodically and may have changed.
- 512GB
- 1TB
Each point is one capture, not a list price. How we track prices
Specifications
- Capacity
- 512GB
- Interface
- NVME
- Sequential read
- 2000 MB/s
- Sequential write
- 1600 MB/s
- PCIe generation
- 3
- Form factor
- M.2 2280
- NAND type
- TLC
- DRAM cache
- Endurance (TBW)
- 350 TB
- Warranty
- 5 years
Capacities
| Configuration | Part number | Endurance (TBW) | Sequential write | Sequential read | Current best price | Price per TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 256GB | 35TTFP6PCIE-256G | 150 TB | 1600 MB/s | 2000 MB/s | — | — |
| 512GB | 35TTFP6PCIE-512G | 350 TB | 1600 MB/s | 2000 MB/s | $114.99 at Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-24 | $224.59/TB |
| 1TB | — | 600 TB | 1600 MB/s | 2000 MB/s | $195.99 at Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-25 | $195.99/TB |
| 2TB | — | 2000 TB | 3000 MB/s | 3400 MB/s | — | — |
Guides for this category
Sources
Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.