Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB
10.00 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 13.75 ns for Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CrucialDDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3200 |
| 22 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 13.75 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | 244,99 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 7,66 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns for Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB, 3.75 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3200 MT/s, or 25600 MB/s per module. They part company on CAS latency instead of on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what tells them apart.
Kit layout
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is specified at 1.2 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and ECC
On lighting: Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On error correction: Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 13.75 ns for Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB. Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.