G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 8.89 ns, against 10.00 ns for Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | G.SKILLRipjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB | NetacShadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600better | 3200 |
| 16 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 8.89better | 10.00 |
| Current best price | — | 189,99 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 5,94 € |
No tracked price for G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 8.89 ns, against 10.00 ns for Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB — a difference of 1.11 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16; Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16.
Transfer rate
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB is rated 3600 MT/s against 3200 MT/s for Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB — 28800 MB/s per module, against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time. Both kits are published at CL16, so the same count of cycles takes less time at the higher clock, and the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 16-19-19-39, and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 16-20-20-40.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency at 8.89 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB faster than Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB?
- G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB is, on true latency: 8.89 ns against 10.00 ns. G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16 and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency at 8.89 ns.