Skip to main content
Seagate

Seagate Exos X20 Spec and Price in Germany

SATA20TB7200 RPM

Exos X20 is Seagate's 18-20TB enterprise nearline generation: helium-sealed 7200rpm mechanics, 256MB of cache, a 550TB/year workload rating, and a five-year warranty, per the Seagate data sheet. Sustained throughput reaches 285 MB/s — the top of the SATA hard-drive envelope — and the CMR recording keeps it safe for every RAID level. On SATA it is a dense, dependable data-center capacity tier, and the price per terabyte is the argument for it.

Current best price
From 680,56 €Price too old to confirm

Prices include VAT.

The last tracked price for the 22TB Seagate Exos X20 in Germany was 680,56 € at Amazon.de, captured 2026-10-12. Across one tracked merchant and 837 days of recorded prices, the 90-day median for the 22TB Seagate Exos X20 is 649,32 € and the lowest recorded price is 267,90 €. This site began capturing prices on July 30, 2026; for Amazon listings, prices dated earlier come from Keepa's price history.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history · 20TB

  • 20TB
  • 22TB
May 4, 2026119 data pointstoday · 680,56 €

Each point is one day's recorded price, not a list price. Points dated before July 30, 2026, when this site began capturing prices, come from Keepa's Amazon price history. How we track prices

Specifications

Capacity
20TB
Interface
SATA
Sequential read
285 MB/s
Sequential write
285 MB/s
Rotation speed
7200 RPM
Form factor
3.5-inch
Cache
256 MB
Warranty
5 years

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberCurrent best price
20TBST20000NM007D

749,99 €

Price too old to confirm

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • At launch the highest-capacity enterprise drive available, rated for a very long mean time between failures under a five-year warranty.
  • Street pricing came in substantially below the mechanically similar NAS drive.

Commonly criticised

  • Consistently underperformed the mechanically identical NAS drive in benchmarks, with higher random latency.

Sources behind this summary

Guides for this category

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.