Skip to main content
PickyPeacock
Sign in
SanDisk SSD Plus
SanDisk

SanDisk SSD Plus Spec and Price in Germany

SATA1TB2.5-inch545 MB/s read

SanDisk's entry-level SATA SSD: the 1TB Plus reads up to 545 MB/s and writes up to 515 MB/s on SATA III, per the documented listings — a budget capacity upgrade for older machines.

100th of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential read. 97th of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential write.

Current best price
From 99,99 €Price too old to confirm

Prices include VAT.

The last tracked price for the 500GB SanDisk SSD Plus in Germany was 99,99 € at Amazon.de, captured 2026-08-27. Across one tracked merchant and 363 days of recorded prices, the 90-day median for the 500GB SanDisk SSD Plus is 98,99 € and the lowest recorded price is 31,99 €. This site began capturing prices on July 30, 2026; for Amazon listings, prices dated earlier come from Keepa's price history.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

30D90D180DAll
  • 1TB
  • 500GB
May 4, 2026152 data pointstoday · 165,00 €

Each point is one day's recorded price, not a list price. Points dated before July 30, 2026, when this site began capturing prices, come from Keepa's Amazon price history. How we track prices

Specifications

Capacity
1TB
Interface
SATA
Sequential read
545 MB/s
Sequential write
515 MB/s
Form factor
2.5-inch

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberEndurance (TBW)Sequential writeSequential readCurrent best pricePrice per TB
1TB——515 MB/s545 MB/s

165,00 €

Price too old to confirm

—
500GBSDSSDA-500G-G28—505 MB/s545 MB/s

99,99 €

Price too old to confirm

—

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 14, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • Reviewers noted the drive works with SanDisk's Dashboard software and is inexpensive for its capacity.
  • Some capacities were found to ship with MLC flash or, in the case of the 480GB model, a DRAM cache, exceeding the budget-SATA norm.

Commonly criticised

  • The line uses a variable bill of materials, with different controllers and NAND between units and capacities, so buyers cannot know what they will receive.
  • Because of that variability, the vendor specified no random performance or endurance guarantee beyond its sequential claims, and results were inconsistent.
  • Reviewers advised shoppers who want a known, repeatable product to avoid the series.

Sources behind this summary

Guides for this category

How to choose an SSDFour questions decide almost every SSD purchase — what fits, how big, how fast, and how much it should cost.NVMe or SATAWhich interface your machine takes, how to tell without opening it, and what the speed difference actually buys you.How much SSD capacity you actually needHow to size a drive from what you already use, why leaving headroom matters, and when one bigger drive beats two small ones.M.2 sizes and SSD form factorsWhat 2280, 2242, and 2.5-inch mean, which one your machine takes, and how to check the keying before you buy.What SSD speed numbers actually tell youSequential versus random performance, why the number on the box describes the rarer case, and how to read it without being misled.PCIe generations for SSDsWhat Gen 3, Gen 4, and Gen 5 change, why a newer drive always works in an older slot, and when the extra speed is worth paying for.TLC, QLC, and DRAM-less SSDsWhat the NAND type and the controller's cache change about how a drive behaves, and when either is worth caring about.SSD endurance and warrantiesWhat TBW and DWPD actually promise, how much a normal machine writes, and when endurance is worth paying extra for.How to install an SSDFitting an M.2 or 2.5-inch drive, choosing between cloning and a clean install, and what to check on the first boot.When an SSD price is actually goodWhy price per terabyte beats any discount percentage, and why a good price on one capacity says nothing about the others.

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.