Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 vs TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 has the lower true latency of the two at 11.33 ns, against 12.00 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairDominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 | TeamGroupT-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6000 |
| 36 | 34 | |
| True latency (ns) | 12.00 | 11.33better |
| Current best price | — | 1096,48 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-04 |
| Price per GB | — | 17,13 € |
No tracked price for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 vs TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 is the lower-latency kit at 11.33 ns against 12.00 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36, 0.67 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36; TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 runs 6000 MT/s at CL34.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 6000 MT/s, or 48000 MB/s per module. They part company on CAS latency instead of on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what tells them apart.
Kit layout
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 ships as 2 × 32GB and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 is specified at 1.4 V and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 is 32-39-39-76, and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 is 30-36-36-76. On error correction: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 is the quicker at 11.33 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 faster than TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34?
- Yes, on true latency: 11.33 ns for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 against 12.00 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36. Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 4x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36 and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 runs 6000 MT/s at CL34, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL34 is the quicker at 11.33 ns of true latency.