Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 comes out ahead: 15.38 ns, where Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB takes 16.67 ns. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4800 | 5200better |
| 40 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.67 | 15.38better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is the lower-latency kit at 15.38 ns, against 16.67 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB — a difference of 1.28 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB runs 4800 MT/s at CL40; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 runs 5200 MT/s at CL40.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is rated 5200 MT/s against 4800 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB — 41600 MB/s per module, against 38400 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time. Both kits are published at CL40, so the same count of cycles takes less time at the higher clock, and the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB is specified at 1.1 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting
On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is published with RGB lighting.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is the quicker at 15.38 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is, on true latency: 15.38 ns against 16.67 ns. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB runs 4800 MT/s at CL40 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 runs 5200 MT/s at CL40; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is the quicker at 15.38 ns of true latency.