Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 vs Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB
10.00 ns of true latency for Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB against 12.00 ns for Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The lower tracked price belongs to Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36, which leaves each kit ahead on one axis and neither ahead on both.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 | KingstonFURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 96 | 96 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 36 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 12.00 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | 1550,99 €betterat Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 | 1803,00 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 16,16 €better | 18,78 € |
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 vs Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 12.00 ns for Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 — a difference of 2.00 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36; Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32.
Transfer rate
Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Price and tracked history
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 is tracked at 1550,99 € — 16,16 € per gigabyte — and Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB at 1803,00 €, or 18,78 €. Both are 96GB kits, so the totals compare directly: Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 is 252,01 € less than Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB. At 1803,00 €, Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB is running 0% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 ships as 2 × 48GB and Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB ships as 2 × 48GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 is published with RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 runs 36-44-44-96, and Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB the quicker on true latency at 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 faster than Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB?
- Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36 and Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which one costs less?
- Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36, at 1550,99 € against 1803,00 € — 252,01 € apart at the same 96GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL36 is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-6400 2x48GB the quicker on true latency at 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.