TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38
10.63 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The lower tracked price belongs to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38, which leaves each kit ahead on one axis and neither ahead on both.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 34 | 38 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.63better | 12.67 |
| Current best price | 929,00 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 | 906,00 €betterat Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-15 |
| Price per GB | 14,52 € | 14,16 €better |
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.63 ns against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38, 2.04 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL34; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 runs 6000 MT/s at CL38.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB is tracked at 929,00 €, or 14,52 € per gigabyte; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 at 906,00 €, or 14,16 €. At the same 64GB, that puts TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 23,00 € less than TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB. TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB's 929,00 € sits 3% under its own 90-day median. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38's 906,00 € sits 13% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting
On lighting: TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 has RGB lighting.
Which to buy
The two split the axes this page measures, so no one kit is the answer. The lower tracked price belongs to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38; the lower true latency to TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB, 10.63 ns against 12.67 ns. Weighing money against latency is a decision about the machine, and it stays with the reader.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.63 ns for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38. TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL34 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38 runs 6000 MT/s at CL38, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38, tracked at 906,00 € against 929,00 €: 23,00 € between them at the same 64GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The two split the axes this page measures, so no one kit is the answer. The lower tracked price belongs to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL38; the lower true latency to TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB, 10.63 ns against 12.67 ns. Weighing money against latency is a decision about the machine, and it stays with the reader.