Toshiba N300 HDD Spec and Price in Spain
Toshiba's N300 is the NAS line of the company's internal drives: 7200rpm, up to a 512MB cache, a 180TB/year workload rating, and a three-year warranty, per the Toshiba data sheet. The N300 is CMR with a stable-speed design aimed at multi-drive home and small-office NAS builds, typically priced a step below the WD Red Plus and IronWolf at the same capacity. The line runs from 4TB to 22TB.
Prices include VAT.
The last tracked price for the 4TB Toshiba N300 HDD in Spain was 304,84 € at Amazon.es, captured 2026-10-12. Across one tracked merchant and 72 days of recorded prices, the 90-day median for the 4TB Toshiba N300 HDD is 461,07 € and the lowest recorded price is 191,96 €. This site began capturing prices on July 30, 2026; for Amazon listings, prices dated earlier come from Keepa's price history.
Captured periodically and may have changed.
- 4TB
- 8TB
- 12TB
Each point is one day's recorded price, not a list price. Points dated before July 30, 2026, when this site began capturing prices, come from Keepa's Amazon price history. How we track prices
Specifications
- Capacity
- 8TB
- Interface
- SATA
- Sequential read
- 281 MB/s
- Sequential write
- 281 MB/s
- Rotation speed
- 7200 RPM
- Form factor
- 3.5-inch
- Cache
- 512 MB
- Warranty
- 3 years
Capacities
| Configuration | Part number | Rotation speed | Cache | Current best price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4TB | HDWG440 | 7200 RPM | 256 MB | 304,84 € Price too old to confirm |
| 8TB | HDWG480 | 7200 RPM | 512 MB | 352,99 € Price too old to confirm |
| 12TB | HDWG21C | 7200 RPM | 256 MB | 560,40 € Price too old to confirm |
| 16TB | HDWG31G | 7200 RPM | 512 MB | — |
What owners and reviewers say
Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices
Commonly praised
- Strong write performance compared with the drives it was tested against.
- Reliability-focused design rated for heavy annual workloads and suited to always-on multi-bay use.
Commonly criticised
- At review time the line topped out below the higher-capacity competing model.
Sources behind this summary
Guides for this category
Sources
Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.