Silicon Power
Silicon Power Storm DDR5-6400 Spec and Price in Spain
DDR52x16GBUDIMM10.00 ns true latency
Silicon Power's Storm line brings RGB to the 6400 MT/s class: the 32GB kit runs CL32 at 1.4V, per the documented listing — the step above the Zenith's 6000 kits, aimed at gamers on high-frequency DDR5 platforms.
Tied 19th of 139 models in the RAM catalog on Speed — 19 models share this figure.
Current best price
Prices include VAT.
Captured periodically and may have changed.- 2x16GB
- 2x32GB
March 20, 202642 capturestoday · 1049,99 €
Each point is one capture, not a list price. How we track prices
Specifications
- Capacity
- 2x16GB
- True latency
- 10.00 ns
- Memory type
- DDR5
- Speed
- 6400 MT/s
- CAS latency
- Form factor
- UDIMM
- Voltage
- 1.4 V
- Modules
- 2
- RGB
- Yes
Capacities
Guides for this category
How much RAM you actually needHow to size memory from the pressure your machine is under now, why running short quietly costs speed, and when a matched pair beats one stick.RAM speed and latency, and when they matterWhat a kit's MT/s and CAS latency each measure, why true latency is the two together, and the machines where the numbers actually change anything.SO-DIMM vs DIMM: the memory a laptop takesWhy laptop memory is a different module from desktop memory, how DDR4 and DDR5 are keyed apart, and why some machines take no module at all.What is ECC memory, and when you need itWhat error-correcting memory actually catches, how registered and load-reduced modules differ from unbuffered ones, and why the platform decides.
What owners and reviewers say
Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 14, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices
Commonly praised
- Reviewers found the 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5-6400 kit fast and stable on an AM5 platform, with both Intel XMP 3.0 and AMD EXPO profiles.
- They rated the build quality highly, singling out the shark-gill ARGB heat spreader and the lifetime warranty.
- Applying the motherboard's EXPO-tweaked preset cut latency and raised memory benchmark scores noticeably over the default profile.
Commonly criticised
- At its rated CL32-39-39-102 profile the kit's latency was noticeably higher than a competing DDR5-6000 kit, and reviewers thought the timings could have been tightened further.
- They cautioned that tighter timings would need adequate case airflow to remain stable.
Sources behind this summary
Sources
Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.