Skip to main content
Samsung

Samsung 9100 Pro Spec and Price in Spain

NVME1TBM.2 228014800 MB/s read

Released February 25, 2025

Samsung's PCIe 5.0 flagship (February 2025) delivers up to 14,800/13,400 MB/s sequential read/write across 1-8TB with a Presto controller and 236-layer TLC NAND, per the official datasheet — the fastest consumer Gen5 drive Samsung has shipped, aimed at AI and high-end gaming builds. The W-suffix MPNs are the heatsink SKUs.

4th of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential read. Tied 2nd of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential write — 2 models share this figure.

Current best price
From 199,95 €Price too old to confirm

Prices include VAT.

The last tracked price for the 1TB Samsung 9100 Pro in Spain was 199,95 € at Amazon.es, captured 2026-09-09. Across one tracked merchant and 291 days of recorded prices, the 90-day median for the 1TB Samsung 9100 Pro is 234,95 € and the lowest recorded price is 150,80 €. This site began capturing prices on July 30, 2026; for Amazon listings, prices dated earlier come from Keepa's price history.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

  • 1TB
  • 2TB
  • 4TB
May 6, 2026208 data pointstoday · 459,01 €

Each point is one day's recorded price, not a list price. Points dated before July 30, 2026, when this site began capturing prices, come from Keepa's Amazon price history. How we track prices

Specifications

Capacity
1TB
Interface
NVME
Sequential read
14800 MB/s
Sequential write
13400 MB/s
PCIe generation
5
Form factor
M.2 2280
NAND type
TLC

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberEndurance (TBW)Sequential writeSequential readCurrent best pricePrice per TB
1TBMZ-VAP1T0B/AM—13400 MB/s14800 MB/s

199,95 €

Price too old to confirm

—
2TBMZ-VAP2T0B/AM———

407,99 €

Price too old to confirm

—
4TBMZ-VAP4T0B/AM4800 TB13400 MB/s14800 MB/s

867,19 €

Price too old to confirm

—

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 5 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • Reviewers measured the fastest transfer speeds they had tested, topping sequential charts with excellent energy efficiency.
  • Its real-world application performance is strong, and it includes a DRAM cache and a large SLC cache.
  • It is available in very high capacities, and the 2TB model is single-sided with a heatsink option.
  • Owners upgrading from PCIe 4.0 drives report noticeable gains in boot and render times.
  • Rated speeds are met or exceeded, and enabling the vendor's performance mode is straightforward.
  • Buyers praise very high transfer speeds and record boot times on a next-generation platform.
  • Installation is reported as straightforward, with Windows setting up without problems.
  • Reviewers describe a large speed jump over older drives, with the operating system and applications starting almost instantly.
  • Installation is consistently called simple, with the drive recognised without BIOS tweaks, and performance holds up under sustained heavy use.

Commonly criticised

  • Its price is high relative to rivals and it is only marginally quicker than the best previous-generation drives in real-world tasks.
  • Write speed drops sharply once the SLC cache fills, and it throttles without a heatsink, which is not bundled.
  • One review found its overall positioning relatively lackluster against the competition.
  • A heatsink is effectively required, and several owners say they had to buy one separately.
  • Owners question whether the price is worth it over a cheaper previous-generation drive.
  • One buyer found it very expensive and noted it was cheaper elsewhere.
  • A reviewer advises using a motherboard heatsink for long-term reliability, implying it needs extra cooling.
  • Several reviewers complain it is very expensive.
  • Owners warn it runs very hot without a heatsink, especially next to a graphics card.

Sources behind this summary

Guides for this category

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.