Skip to main content
PickyPeacock
Sign in
Samsung

Samsung T5 EVO Spec and Price in Spain

USB4TB460 MB/s read

Released November 14, 2023 ·

The T5 EVO sits at the capacity end of Samsung's portable range rather than the speed end: it runs USB 3.2 Gen 1 at 5 Gbps and reads and writes at up to 460 MB/s, well under half what the T7 does on the same kind of link, but it is the only Samsung portable line that reaches 8TB. Samsung ships it at 2TB, 4TB and 8TB in a body of 40 x 95 x 17 mm weighing 102 grams, with a three-year limited warranty. It arrived in November 2023 at a $349.99 MSRP for the 4TB.

106th of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential read. 104th of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential write.

Current best price
From 442,05 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-15 · 110,51 €/TBView at Amazon.es

Prices include VAT.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

30D90D180DAll
  • 4TB
  • 8TB
August 19, 202610 capturestoday · 1539,42 €

Each point is one capture, not a list price. How we track prices

Specifications

Capacity
4TB
Interface
USB
Sequential read
460 MB/s
Sequential write
460 MB/s
Warranty
3 years

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberCurrent best pricePrice per TB
2TBMU-PH2T0S/AM——
4TBMU-PH4T0S/AM
442,05 €

at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-15

110,51 €/TB
8TBMU-PH8T0S/AM
1539,42 €

at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13

192,43 €/TB

Guides for this category

How to choose an SSDFour questions decide almost every SSD purchase — what fits, how big, how fast, and how much it should cost.NVMe or SATAWhich interface your machine takes, how to tell without opening it, and what the speed difference actually buys you.How much SSD capacity you actually needHow to size a drive from what you already use, why leaving headroom matters, and when one bigger drive beats two small ones.M.2 sizes and SSD form factorsWhat 2280, 2242, and 2.5-inch mean, which one your machine takes, and how to check the keying before you buy.What SSD speed numbers actually tell youSequential versus random performance, why the number on the box describes the rarer case, and how to read it without being misled.PCIe generations for SSDsWhat Gen 3, Gen 4, and Gen 5 change, why a newer drive always works in an older slot, and when the extra speed is worth paying for.TLC, QLC, and DRAM-less SSDsWhat the NAND type and the controller's cache change about how a drive behaves, and when either is worth caring about.SSD endurance and warrantiesWhat TBW and DWPD actually promise, how much a normal machine writes, and when endurance is worth paying extra for.How to install an SSDFitting an M.2 or 2.5-inch drive, choosing between cloning and a clean install, and what to check on the first boot.When an SSD price is actually goodWhy price per terabyte beats any discount percentage, and why a good price on one capacity says nothing about the others.

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 2 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • Impressively compact for its capacity and well built, with a coating that resists scratches.
  • The bundled management software adds long-term value, suiting users who value capacity and cost over raw speed.
  • Owners value the large capacity in a small, pocketable design.
  • It is described as durable and shock-resistant, giving owners confidence when carrying it.
  • Setup is plug-and-play over USB-C and works with Macs and other devices.
  • Owners consider it good value for a high-capacity portable SSD, particularly on sale.

Commonly criticised

  • Slower than other drives in the same portable line, so it is a poor fit for performance-critical use.
  • Several owners report real-world transfer speeds below the advertised figure.
  • Owners note the only bundled cable is USB-C, so USB-A machines need an adapter, and one saw transfers slow sharply through an adapter.
  • One owner returned the drive because it could not charge a handheld while connected.

Sources behind this summary

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.