Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB

CorsairVengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB32 GB · 3600 MT/s · 18 CL · 10.00 nsLeads on Speed
NetacShadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB32 GB · 3200 MT/s · 16 CL · 10.00 ns
In short

Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.

SpecificationCorsairVengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GBNetacShadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)3600better3200
1816
True latency (ns)10.0010.00
Current best price195,00 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13
Price per GB6,09 €

No tracked price for Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.

Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB in detail

True latency

Both kits land on 10.00 ns by different routes: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB at 3600 MT/s at CL18, Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB at 3200 MT/s at CL16. A CAS number counts cycles rather than time, so a higher clock absorbs a looser one and the two arrive together — which is why these spec sheets look different and the memory does not.

Transfer rate

Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB is rated 3600 MT/s against 3200 MT/s for Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB — 28800 MB/s per module, against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Kit layout

Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Lighting, timings and ECC

On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 18-22-22-42, and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 16-20-20-40. On error correction: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB is published with no ECC, and the catalog does not state whether Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB supports it. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.

Which to buy

No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 10.00 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.

Common questions about this pair

Is Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB faster than Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB?
Neither. Both come out at 10.00 ns of true latency: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL18 and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16, and the two reconcile to one figure.
Which of these two should I buy?
No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 10.00 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.
How we track prices

Related comparisons