Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB
10.00 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 13.75 ns for Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is tracked at the lower price, so the two split the axes this page measures, one each.
| Specification | CrucialDDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3200 |
| 22 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 13.75 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | 254,98 €betterat Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 | 278,27 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 7,97 €better | 8,70 € |
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns for Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB, 3.75 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3200 MT/s, or 25600 MB/s per module. They part company on CAS latency instead of on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what tells them apart.
Price and tracked history
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is tracked at 254,98 €, or 7,97 € per gigabyte; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB at 278,27 €, or 8,70 €. At the same 32GB, that puts Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB 23,29 € less than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB. Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB's 254,98 € sits 16% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is specified at 1.2 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and ECC
On lighting: Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On error correction: Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
The two split the axes this page measures, so no one kit is the answer. The lower tracked price belongs to Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB; the lower true latency to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB, 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns. Weighing money against latency is a decision about the machine, and it stays with the reader.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 13.75 ns for Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB. Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB, tracked at 254,98 € against 278,27 €: 23,29 € between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The two split the axes this page measures, so no one kit is the answer. The lower tracked price belongs to Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB; the lower true latency to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB, 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns. Weighing money against latency is a decision about the machine, and it stays with the reader.