Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB vs PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB

GigastoneGame Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB64 GB · 3200 MT/s · 16 CL · 10.00 nsLeads on Speed
PHS-memoryDDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB64 GB · 2400 MT/s · 17 CL · 14.17 ns
In short

10.00 ns of true latency for Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB against 14.17 ns for PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. On top of the latency, Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB carries the lower tracked price, so both measured axes point the same way.

SpecificationGigastoneGame Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GBPHS-memoryDDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB
Capacity (GB)6464
Speed (MT/s)3200better2400
1617
True latency (ns)10.00better14.17
Current best price466,99 €betterat Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13778,93 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-04
Price per GB7,30 €better12,17 €

Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB vs PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB in detail

True latency

Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 14.17 ns for PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB — a difference of 4.17 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB runs 2400 MT/s at CL17.

Transfer rate

Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB is rated 3200 MT/s against 2400 MT/s for PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB — 25600 MB/s per module, against 19200 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Price and tracked history

Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB is tracked at 466,99 € — 7,30 € per gigabyte — and PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB at 778,93 €, or 12,17 €. Both are 64GB kits, so the totals compare directly: Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB is 311,94 € less than PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB. At 466,99 €, Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB is running 41% below its own 90-day median. 778,93 € is the lowest price this site has recorded for PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB.

Kit layout

Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB ships as 4 × 16GB, PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB. That is a real difference and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for a later addition. Which suits depends on the board and on whether more memory is planned.

Voltage

Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB at 1.2 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.

Lighting and timings

On the lighting question: Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB runs 16-18-18-40, and PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB does not publish one.

Which to buy

Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB leads PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 10.00 ns against 14.17 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.

Common questions about this pair

Is Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB faster than PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB?
Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 14.17 ns. Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16 and PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB runs 2400 MT/s at CL17; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
Which one costs less?
Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB, at 466,99 € against 778,93 € — 311,94 € apart at the same 64GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 4x16GB leads PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 10.00 ns against 14.17 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.
How we track prices

Related comparisons