G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB
7.78 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB against 8.00 ns for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | G.SkillTrident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4000better | 3600 |
| 16 | 14 | |
| True latency (ns) | 8.00 | 7.78better |
| Current best price | — | 356,72 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 11,15 € |
No tracked price for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 7.78 ns, against 8.00 ns for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.22 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB runs 4000 MT/s at CL16; TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14.
Transfer rate
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is rated 4000 MT/s against 3600 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB — 32000 MB/s per module, against 28800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting
On the lighting question: G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the quicker at 7.78 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB?
- TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is, on true latency: 7.78 ns against 8.00 ns. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB runs 4000 MT/s at CL16 and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the quicker at 7.78 ns of true latency.