G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB

G.SkillTridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB32 GB · 3600 MT/s · 16 CL · 8.89 nsLeads on Speed
TimetecPremium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB32 GB · 2666 MT/s · 19 CL · 14.25 nsLeads on Current best price
In short

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 8.89 ns, against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB. Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is tracked at the lower price, so the two split the axes this page measures, one each.

SpecificationG.SkillTridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GBTimetecPremium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)3600better2666
1619
True latency (ns)8.89better14.25
Current best price313,03 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13190,99 €betterat Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13
Price per GB9,78 €5,97 €better

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB in detail

True latency

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 8.89 ns against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB, 5.37 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16; Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 2666 MT/s at CL19.

Transfer rate

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 3600 MT/s to 2666 MT/s for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB — 28800 MB/s per module against 21328 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.

Price and tracked history

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB is tracked at 313,03 €, or 9,78 € per gigabyte; Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB at 190,99 €, or 5,97 €. At the same 32GB, that puts Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 122,04 € less than G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB. G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB's 313,03 € sits 4% under its own 90-day median.

Kit layout

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.

Lighting and ECC

On lighting: G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB has it, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.

Which to buy

There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB the quicker on true latency at 8.89 ns against 14.25 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.

Common questions about this pair

Is G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB?
Yes, on true latency: 8.89 ns for G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB. G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16 and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 2666 MT/s at CL19, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
Which one costs less?
Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB, tracked at 190,99 € against 313,03 €: 122,04 € between them at the same 32GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3600 2x16GB the quicker on true latency at 8.89 ns against 14.25 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.
How we track prices

Related comparisons