Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 vs Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB
8.89 ns of true latency for Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | KingstonFURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 | TimetecPremium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 16 | 16 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600better | 3200 |
| 16 | 22 | |
| True latency (ns) | 8.89better | 13.75 |
| Current best price | — | 106,99 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 6,69 € |
No tracked price for Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 vs Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 is the lower-latency kit at 8.89 ns, against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB — a difference of 4.86 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 runs 3600 MT/s at CL16; Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22.
Transfer rate
Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 is rated 3600 MT/s against 3200 MT/s for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB — 28800 MB/s per module, against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 ships as 2 × 8GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB ships as 2 × 8GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 is specified at 1.35 V and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB at 1.2 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 does not have RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 runs 16-20-20, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB does not publish one. On error correction: Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 is published with no ECC, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 has the lower true latency, 8.89 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB?
- Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 is, on true latency: 8.89 ns against 13.75 ns. Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 runs 3600 MT/s at CL16 and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x8GB CL16 has the lower true latency, 8.89 ns.