Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB vs SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB

KioxiaExceria Pro G2 2TB2000 GB · 14900 MB/s · 13400 MB/s · 1200 TBW
SanDiskOptimus GX PRO 8100 2TB2000 GB · 14900 MB/s · 14000 MB/s · 1200 TBWLeads on Sequential write
In short

The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.

SpecificationKioxiaExceria Pro G2 2TBSanDiskOptimus GX PRO 8100 2TB
Capacity (GB)20002000
Sequential read (MB/s)1490014900
Sequential write (MB/s)1340014000better
Current best price568,99 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13
Price per TB284,50 €
Endurance (TBW)12001200
Warranty (years)55
DRAM cacheYesYes
NAND typetlctlc
ControllerSilicon Motion SM2508

How these two compare

Sequential throughput

Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB is rated 14900 MB/s read and 13400 MB/s write; SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB, 14900 MB/s read and 14000 MB/s write. These are peak sequential rates over PCIe — the speed you would see copying one large file. For boot, app launches and everyday feel, random access matters more than this headline figure.

Random access

On random 4K access — the small, scattered reads and writes behind boot, app launches and general responsiveness — Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB is rated 2 250 000 read and 1 950 000 write IOPS, SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB 2 300 000 read and 2 400 000 write. This is the figure that follows everyday feel, where the sequential rates above follow big-file copies.

Endurance

The makers warrant 1200 TBW on Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB and 1200 TBW on SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB — how much writing each is rated to take before the endurance clause lapses. Most desktop workloads never come close, so read the two against each other rather than as a limit you are likely to reach.

DRAM cache

Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB carries a DRAM cache; SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB carries a DRAM cache. A DRAM cache holds the drive's mapping table — the index of where each block physically sits — so the controller places and finds data without an extra flash lookup. A DRAM-less drive borrows a little system memory (HMB) or a slice of its own flash instead, and is likelier to slow once a long run of random writes outlasts its fast cache.

NAND, controller and warranty

NAND: Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB uses TLC and SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB uses TLC. The tier is bits per cell — SLC, MLC, TLC and QLC from one to four — trading density against endurance and sustained-write speed: QLC is cheapest per gigabyte, TLC the mainstream balance, and the denser the cell the sooner sustained writes taper. On the controller: Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB uses the Silicon Motion SM2508, and SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB's controller is not stated. It is the chip handling error correction, wear-levelling and where each write lands — much of how a drive holds up under load — even if the part number on its own tells you little. On the cover: Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB carries a 5-year warranty, SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB carries a 5-year warranty. The length is the maker's own vote of confidence, and on an SSD it tends to track the endurance rating — a longer warranty usually meaning more rated writes.

Which to buy

With a price missing for at least one side, there is no cost verdict to give. What separates two otherwise-similar drives is up in the sections above — sustained and random behaviour, whether there is a DRAM cache, the flash tier and the warranty — so weigh those against what your build needs.

Common questions about this pair

Which is faster, Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB or SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB?
Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB is rated 14900 MB/s read and 13400 MB/s write; SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB, 14900 MB/s read and 14000 MB/s write. These are peak sequential rates over PCIe — the speed you would see copying one large file. For boot, app launches and everyday feel, random access matters more than this headline figure.
How do Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB and SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB compare on random access?
On random 4K access — the small, scattered reads and writes behind boot, app launches and general responsiveness — Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB is rated 2 250 000 read and 1 950 000 write IOPS, SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB 2 300 000 read and 2 400 000 write. This is the figure that follows everyday feel, where the sequential rates above follow big-file copies.
Should you buy Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 2TB or SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 2TB?
With a price missing for at least one side, there is no cost verdict to give. What separates two otherwise-similar drives is up in the sections above — sustained and random behaviour, whether there is a DRAM cache, the flash tier and the warranty — so weigh those against what your build needs.
How we track prices

Related comparisons