Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB vs NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB
16.25 ns of true latency for NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB against 16.43 ns for Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | MicronDDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB | NEMIXDDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600 | 6400better |
| 46 | 52 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.43 | 16.25better |
| Current best price | 1 222,29 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 38,20 € | — |
No tracked price for NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB vs NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB in detail
True latency
NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 16.25 ns against 16.43 ns for Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB, 0.18 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46; NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52.
Transfer rate
NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 5600 MT/s for Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 44800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB ships as 1 × 32GB and NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB ships as 1 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and ECC
On lighting: Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB is published with no RGB lighting, and NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB is published with no RGB lighting. On error correction: Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB supports ECC, and NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB supports ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB has the lower true latency, 16.25 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB faster than NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 16.25 ns for NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB against 16.43 ns for Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB. Micron DDR5-5600 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46 and NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that NEMIX DDR5-6400 ECC RDIMM 1x32GB has the lower true latency, 16.25 ns.