PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200
15.38 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 against 16.25 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | PHS-memoryDDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 5200 |
| 52 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.25 | 15.38better |
| Current best price | 1 781,82 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 27,84 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is the lower-latency kit at 15.38 ns against 16.25 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB, 0.86 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 runs 5200 MT/s at CL40.
Transfer rate
PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 5200 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 — 51200 MB/s per module against 41600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting
On lighting: PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 has RGB lighting.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 has the lower true latency, 15.38 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200?
- Yes, on true latency: 15.38 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 against 16.25 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB. PHS-memory DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 runs 5200 MT/s at CL40, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 has the lower true latency, 15.38 ns.