Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB has the lower true latency of the two at 7.78 ns, against 10.00 ns for Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | Silicon PowerXPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 16 | 16 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3600better |
| 16 | 14 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 7.78better |
| Current best price | 135,99 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-12 | — |
| Price per GB | 8,50 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB is the lower-latency kit at 7.78 ns against 10.00 ns for Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB, 2.22 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB carries the higher rating, 3600 MT/s to 3200 MT/s for Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB — 28800 MB/s per module against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB ships as 2 × 8GB and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB ships as 2 × 8GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB is specified at 1.35 V and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB at 1.45 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB is 16-18-18-38, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB publishes none.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB has the lower true latency, 7.78 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 7.78 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB against 10.00 ns for Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB. Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16 and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x8GB has the lower true latency, 7.78 ns.