A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) vs Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB
10.00 ns of true latency for Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB against 13.75 ns for A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB), so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | A-Tech32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) | KingstonFURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 128 | 128 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3200 |
| 22 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 13.75 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | — | £1,810.08at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | £14.14 |
No tracked price for A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) vs Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns for A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB), 3.75 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3200 MT/s, or 25600 MB/s per module. They part company on CAS latency instead of on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what tells them apart.
Kit layout
A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) ships as 2 × 64GB and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB ships as 2 × 64GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) is specified at 1.2 V and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) is published with no RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) publishes none, and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB is 16-20-20. On error correction: A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB has the lower true latency at 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) faster than Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB against 13.75 ns for A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB). A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 128GB Kit (4x32GB) runs 3200 MT/s at CL22 and Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR4-3200 4x32GB has the lower true latency at 10.00 ns.