ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. Neither is quicker than the other; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is simply tracked at the lower price, and that is the whole of it.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 30 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | £515.67at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 | £419.99betterat Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | £16.11 | £13.12better |
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns by different routes: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB at 6400 MT/s at CL32, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 6000 MT/s at CL30. A CAS number counts cycles rather than time, so a higher clock absorbs a looser one and the two arrive together — which is why these spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Price and tracked history
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at £515.67 — £16.11 per gigabyte — and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB at £419.99, or £13.12. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is £95.68 less than ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB. At £515.67, ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is running 14% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 32-39-39, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 30-36-36-76.
Which to buy
At the prices tracked here KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB undercuts ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB, and the two are level on true latency at 10.00 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Neither. Both come out at 10.00 ns of true latency: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, and the two reconcile to one figure.
- Which one costs less?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB, at £419.99 against £515.67 — £95.68 apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At the prices tracked here KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB undercuts ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB, and the two are level on true latency at 10.00 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.