ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB and Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. Neither is quicker than the other; ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is simply tracked at the lower price, and that is the whole of it.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | LexarARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 30 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | £515.67betterat Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 | £593.99at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | £16.11better | £18.56 |
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB gets there at 6400 MT/s at CL32, Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 6000 MT/s at CL30. CAS latency counts clock cycles rather than time, so a higher clock paired with a looser CAS number arrives at the same place — which is why these two spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at £515.67, or £16.11 per gigabyte; Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at £593.99, or £18.56. At the same 32GB, that puts ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB £78.32 less than Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB's £515.67 sits 14% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39, and Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is 30-38-38-76.
Which to buy
At the prices tracked here ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB undercuts Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, and the two are level on true latency at 10.00 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, and those two land in the same place.
- Which one costs less?
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB, tracked at £515.67 against £593.99: £78.32 between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At the prices tracked here ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB undercuts Lexar ARES RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, and the two are level on true latency at 10.00 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.